Compoglass F
Clinical indication(s) / Claim(s)
Verbatim per manufacturer's Instructions-for-use (IFU) sheet

IFU Link
Claim 1: Restoration of deciduous teeth
Claim 2: Class V restorations (cervical caries, root erosion, wedge-shaped defects)
Claim 3: Class III restorations
Claim 4: Small to medium sized restorations of classes I and II








 
 
 
 

Clinical evidence supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not related to the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
(c) RCHSR
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 1 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
Claim 1 and 4:
Ertugrul F, Cogulu D, Ozdemir Y, Ersin N. Comparison of conventional versus colored compomers for class II restorations in primary molars: a 12-month clinical study. Med Princ Pract. 2010;19(2):148-52.

Claim 2:
Zhou Chaomei Wu Yong Li Ronglin Zhang Xiaoting. Evaluation of the effect of two kinds of complexes in filling wedge-shaped defects. Guangdong Dent Dis Prev Contr 2004; 12: 115.

Abdalla AI, Mahallawy SE, Davidson CL. Clinical and SEM evaluations of three compomer systems in Class V carious lesions. J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Aug;29(8):714-9.

Ermis RB. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Quintessence Int. 2002 Jul-Aug;33(7):542-8.

Claim 3: